Although the United States generally has a negative stigma attached to prison and those who reside there, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the prison system in America has 3 major purposes: punishment/retribution, personal reform and deterrence from committing another crime after the prisoner is released. These are all very noble ambitions that appear to not only focus on improving our greater communities, but improving the prisoner individually and bettering that individual’s life. Clearly, theoretically the prison system benefits both the community and the criminal.
With that being said, although not much can be negatively said about the theoretical and fundamental objectives of the prison system, there are quite a lot of problems with the actual functioning prison system that need to be addressed urgently. We are each affected directly by the issue of an ill-functioning prison system because it is our tax dollars that fund the system (according to Heartsandminds.org, approximately $32 billion of our tax dollars every year!) and these are our communities that inmates are being released into at the end of their sentences. It is our responsibility as American citizens to ensure that our prison system is as effective and efficient as possible and therefore it is our responsibility to discuss the troubled aspects of our current system and refine it. First, let’s look at the functions of the prison as suggested by the Encyclopedia Britannica.
The first role of the prison system is as punishment and retribution for crimes committed by individuals refered to as ciminals (Encyclopedia Britannica). There is relatively little argument about the fact that something must be done with individuals who commit crimes. The United States would obviously have an anarchist society if there was no punishment for crime. However, the prison system’s current method of punishment is increasing harsh discipline as a means of creating remorse and transformation in an individual. However,spending 23 hours a day in a 6 x 8 foot cell with only 2 showers a week and 10 minutes on the phone per month, as in the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois (Faults) create remorse in an inmate. No, rather this treatment is going to teach contempt, retaliation and the need for avengence. It is necessary to determine where the cross the line between punishment and inhumane treatment stands. As Dave Hale, a former guard at Marion so eloquently stated, “I seen them carry one inmate down the corridor with a guard on each leg and one on each arm. The assistant warden comes down the hall and grabs the inmate’s testicles and starts yanking on them, saying, ‘Who’s doing it to who now, boy?’”(Faults) This treatment is not only inhumane, this is torture and certainly not acceptable punishment even for the most hardened of criminals.
The second focus of the US prison system is to create personal reform in all inmates spending time in US penitentiaries (Encyclopedia Britannica). Many prisons do have programs that are available for the betterment of the inmates ranging from counseling, to technical training to GED programs. However, in many cases, being part of this program is considered an earned privilege. Although this may seem like a good incentive to get prisoners to behave and comply, in actuality, when the prisoner makes a mistake and his or her hard earned privileges are suddenly revoked, there is very little incentive to go through the motions of getting all of those privileges back. Programs such as these should be learning experiences for the prisoner, building on any mistakes that potentially could be made. When teaching a child to ride a bicycle, the child is not expected to master the skill on the first try. Likewise, a prisoner learning for the first time how to be a functioning member of society will not be perfect, and those mistakes need to be embraced as potentially for further learning. Although the supportive programs that many prisons currently have to offer are headed in the right direction, there is definite room for evolution and improvement here as well.
The 3rd major role of the prison system is deterrence from future crimes. This goal, in fact, might be the overarching ambition of the entire system. Prisoners would ideally do their time, learn their lessons and go on with their lives in a healthy, productive manner. However, this goal especially is not supported by the actions of penitentiaries. Inmates have support and available resources while incarceration, however, once they are released, for the most part that support vanishes completely. The only hope of continued support after prison life is either a halfway house of some sort or being assigned a parole officer (often though, even the parole officers are overstretched and don’t have the necessary time to devote to all of their parolees). Inmates are often released into an environment where they have no home, relatively no family or friends, no job skills, no money and no health insurance. How is this possibly setting the inmate up for success in the “real world”?
The ineffectiveness of the deterrence methods in our prison system is quite obvious just by reviewing the return rate of prisoners back into the justice system. Within 3 years of release, 67.5% of former inmates are readmitted into the system on either a felony or “serious misdemeanor” charge (Faults). Furthermore, with an average mental health problem (psychiatric disorders) prevalence being 56% of inmates for state prisons and 45% in federal prisons (Fitzpatrick), many inmates are in dire need of corrective medication. Although (for the most part) medication is administered and closely monitored, once they are released with no health insurance, it is nearly impossible for them to continue with much needed medication even if they would like to. Clearly, this is a potential contributor to the high return rate into the US prison system.
It is therefore essential that our communities and country make improvements and reforms to our prison system. There are two vital changes that need to occur to the system that will make to change the course of the lives of the inmates, and ultimately better our society. The first of these changes in individualized rehabilitation that directly addresses the inmate’s specific needs. Every prisoner is unique and therefore will need an individualized treatment as well as goals and objectives and follow ups (Fault). Some inmates might need anger management, others may need psychiatric medication, and still others might require vocational training or living skills. Individual problems cannot be solved until they are addressed as unique circumstances requiring individualized attention, rather than a cookie cutter solution.
Secondly, the programs previously mentioned need to be implemented as an alternative to a prison sentence (Fault). Obviously the inmate will still be living in a prison environment, however, instead of being locked up for 23+ hours/day in “the hole” (prison slang for solitary confinement), the individual needs to be spending that time focused on their objectives for self betterment. While some may say that this is not “punishment” enough, chances are the inmate will still be experiencing a situation that he or she would rather not be in- self-improvement can be hard, especially when there is a lot of improving of the self to be done. Furthermore, these programs will benefit the community much more than just having an inmate literally wasting away years of his life in a 6 x 8 foot cell, just to be rereleased into a cold, unforgiving world.
If the prisoner decides that he or she does not want to participate in the self-improvement courses, he or she will have the option to serve regular prison time. Some may still choose this route, but at least they will have the option for something more fulfilling.
The biggest rebuttal in this proposed plan will undoubtedly be the cost factor involved. Obviously, staff and other resources necessary to implement this plan will cause a much greater cost (both financial and time) than just throwing someone in a prison cell to sit for months, even years of their life. However, considering the long term cost, re-admittance of inmates into the criminal justice system 67% of the time will be much more expensive than just allocating the correct funding and resources in the first place. According to Fault, the cost of housing one inmate for one year is $14,000 in taxes. Re-admitting prisoners over and over will obviously not be cost efficient in the long run as compared to one-time rehabilitation.
Although this proposed theortical system is not without flaws, it is a major improvement in many areas over our current prison system. We must make it a priority within our society to make the reform of our prison system into a more efficient and effective institution and we will all reap the benefits.
Works Cited
“Faults of the American Prison System.” Associated Content from Yahoo! 19 Jan. 2009. Web. 10 Feb. 2011.
Fitzpatrick, Michael J. “NAMI | Department of Justice Study: Mental Illness of Prison Inmates Worse Than Past Estimates.” NAMI: National Alliance on Mental Illness – Mental Health Support, Education and Advocacy. Department of Justice, 6 Sept. 2006. Web. 10 Feb. 2011.
Fortunato, Manny, comp. “Prison Facts.” Hearts & Minds. Hearts & Minds – Information for Change. Web. 10 Feb. 2011.
“The purpose of imprisonment.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011. Web. 10 Feb. 2011.